But I do not see it in any worse condition than when it was acquired.
I would agree with that statement. In my opinion, a large missing piece is the worst form of damage (aesthetically speaking) so it's a good idea to hide it if at all possible. A missing piece is analogous to a hole or a severe edge knock on a coin. These are real eyesores that just won't go away. Unfortunately, a large missing piece is one of the most difficult types of damage to repair. It usually requires obtaining another note printed on the same type of paper (typically a common foreign note), removing an appropriate piece, and then bonding the piece carefully to the damaged note under a microscope. I've tried it myself in the past and have never had any real success. A tear is relatively easy to seal but a missing piece is another matter entirely. Also, it's easy to cause further damage to a note during a major repair by the use of organic solvents that can cause the ink to run and/or to lose its intensity, and by the use of glues that can change the texture and translucency of the paper.
Anyway, I've seen some atrocious repairs in the past (a Royal Bank of Canada $100 1913 note that did the rounds on eBay and at several public auctions in the last year comes to mind) but this $100 Commerce note is not one of them! In the present case, I would suggest that about 75% of collectors would prefer the repaired note while 25% would prefer the original damaged note ... but who knows for sure? The best way to find out what the note may be worth is to put it up on eBay in an unrestricted auction with a low starting price (with a reserve) and see what happens. The catalogue value is $600 in Fine and $950 in VF.
« Last Edit: September 07, 2007, 09:07:57 am by Ottawa »
Logged
" Buy the very best notes that you can afford and keep them for at least 10 years. " (Richard D. Lockwood, private communication, 1978).