CPM Forum

General => Banknote Grading Standards and TPG => Topic started by: Mortgage Guy on July 01, 2009, 11:01:33 am

Title: .
Post by: Mortgage Guy on July 01, 2009, 11:01:33 am
.
Title: Re: Graded notes Holder size
Post by: friedsquid on July 01, 2009, 12:07:23 pm
Quote
Can someone tell me why holders are so large for notes that have been graded?
Very simply put 75% note 25% Advertising ;D
Title: Re: Graded notes Holder size
Post by: abyss on July 06, 2009, 08:35:48 am
Quote
Very simply put 75% note 25% Advertising

In a way that makes sense....Anytime you see a TPG note you see who graded it before you see the notes itself...
In someways that can be a good thing....or NOT!

ABYSS
Title: Re: Graded notes Holder size
Post by: Ottawa on July 06, 2009, 02:24:24 pm
Can someone tell me why holders are so large for notes that have been graded? Is it simply that the 1 size is just practical as most notes will fit?

I guess that when new TPG companies are established they naturally tend to use holders of the same size as those being used by the other companies. TPG holders could certainly be smaller than they are but it's probably too late to change now. The downside of TPG holders is that they use up huge amounts of space in display cases at shows and they're heavy to lug around in bulk.
Title: Re: Graded notes Holder size
Post by: BWJM on July 06, 2009, 04:43:34 pm
There's also the matter of "one size fits all" so that you can save costs by only manufacturing a single size of holder and it can accommodate anything from shinplasters to large-size Dominion and chartered notes.
Title: Re: Graded notes Holder size
Post by: Ottawa on July 06, 2009, 05:36:34 pm
There's also the matter of "one size fits all" so that you can save costs by only manufacturing a single size of holder and it can accommodate anything from shinplasters to large-size Dominion and chartered notes.

That's an idea I would support wholeheartedly. When you think about it in detail it's the logical way to go.
Title: .
Post by: Mortgage Guy on July 06, 2009, 05:40:29 pm
.