CPM Forum

Special => Special Serial Number Notes => Topic started by: 4mile123 on October 29, 2015, 09:38:11 pm

Title: should be a rotator...
Post by: 4mile123 on October 29, 2015, 09:38:11 pm
I understand from previous threads that, technically, this note does not qualify as a rotator.
Would it have any additional value die to the serial number?
Title: Re: should be a rotator...
Post by: 4mile123 on October 29, 2015, 09:43:10 pm
I understand from previous threads that, technically, this note does not qualify as a rotator.
Would it have any additional value due to the serial number?

http://imagizer.imageshack.com/img911/4994/4JVlSI.jpg
Title: Re: should be a rotator...
Post by: Seth on October 31, 2015, 12:15:57 am
I would count it as a rotator. The editors of Charlton assert that 1s are disallowed because of the serif, but 8s are allowed despite the sizes of the loops being different. Charlton is just a publishing company that issues an annual catalogue, it's not an official word on anything. You are welcome to disagree on their definition; I certainly do.
Title: Re: should be a rotator...
Post by: Manada on October 31, 2015, 09:42:47 am
PMG seems to feel the same way...

{attach:3601}
Title: Re: should be a rotator...
Post by: Manada on October 31, 2015, 09:47:27 am
Though it may be an error as the front only states its a replacement.

{attach:3602}
Title: Re: should be a rotator...
Post by: 4mile123 on October 31, 2015, 11:51:17 am
Thanks for your input guys.
I've always thought it was a rotator. It's nice to know someone else thinks.
Title: Re: should be a rotator...
Post by: Manada on October 31, 2015, 01:46:40 pm
Thanks for your input guys.
I've always thought it was a rotator. It's nice to know someone else thinks.

Hi 4mile123,

I am by no means stating that under Canadian standards it is a rotator, only that PMG which is an American grading company in this case has whether by error or not.

Manny