CPM Forum

Special => Insert & Replacement Notes => Topic started by: titoo1250 on November 12, 2008, 09:59:19 pm

Title: BEK 2003 NO INSERT
Post by: titoo1250 on November 12, 2008, 09:59:19 pm
YOU KNOW MUCH IS FIND 2003 BEK NO INSET.THANKS
Title: Re: BEK 2003 NO INSERT
Post by: titoo1250 on November 12, 2008, 10:02:44 pm
YOU KNOW MUCH IS FIND 2003 BEK NO INSERT
Title: Re: BEK 2003 NO INSERT
Post by: friedsquid on November 12, 2008, 10:35:06 pm
YOU KNOW MUCH IS FIND 2003 BEK NO INSERT

Sorry but I'm not to sure as to what info you require?
 ???
If you are referring to the BEK changeover I assume valued over $300 in choice unc.
Title: Re: BEK 2003 NO INSERT
Post by: Gary_T on November 12, 2008, 10:58:12 pm
 Please let me translate.

 Does anyone know how many 2003 BEK non-inserts have been found?

 I'm French Canadian  ;D
Title: Re: BEK 2003 NO INSERT
Post by: nova7415 on November 18, 2008, 01:22:52 am
Tres bon Gary ;)
Title: Re: BEK 2003 NO INSERT
Post by: Elwoodbluesca on November 18, 2008, 11:32:46 am
Some quick math for you


Regular Issue                
Cat No.  Den.  Prefix   Sig.  Date  Numbers  Qty Printed
BC-63b-i  $10   BEK   K-D   2002  0000000-8599999   8,600,000
BC-63c   $10   BEK   J-D   2003  8600000-9999999   1,400,000
                 
Sheet Replacement                
Replacements   Den.  Prefix   Sig.  Date  Numbers  Qty Printed
BC-63cA   $10   BEK   J-D   2003  9315000-9405000   90,000
BC-63cA  $10   BEK   J-D   2003  9495000-9675000   180,000
BC-63cA $10   BEK   J-D   2003  9675000-9720000   45,000
               Total Replacements   315,000
                 
2003 BEK Issue                
Regular Issue  1,400,000              
Sheet Replacement 315,000  minus          
Total 2003 BEK Regular Issue  1,085,000              
   

Does this answer your questino??          
           
Title: Re: BEK 2003 NO INSERT
Post by: Dr.Bill on November 18, 2008, 12:17:02 pm
I believe the question is:  how many 2003 BEK non-inserts have been found or saved by collectors, not how many notes were printed.
Title: Re: BEK 2003 NO INSERT
Post by: Elwoodbluesca on November 18, 2008, 12:52:12 pm
Thanks for point out my over sight, I should have addressed that, but I do not have a crystalball to give that answer. No one will ever know, but it is a tougher note.
Title: Re: BEK 2003 NO INSERT
Post by: polarbear on November 18, 2008, 03:13:46 pm
I think that the range you have Elwoodbluesca  is incorrect.  I have an feeling that the replacement range has changed.

cheers

polarbear 
Title: Re: BEK 2003 NO INSERT
Post by: titoo1250 on November 19, 2008, 10:02:11 pm
THANK GARY T.MY ENGLISH IS BAD.
Title: Re: BEK 2003 NO INSERT
Post by: Gary_T on November 19, 2008, 10:14:06 pm
 My french is more bad and my english isn't that great either.

Title: Re: BEK 2003 NO INSERT
Post by: walktothewater on November 23, 2008, 11:08:01 pm
Wasn't there suppose to be 7,200,000 -2003 BER printed -but not necessarily released?

There were suppose to be 40,000,000 BEL-BEP printed and released. Charlton states that "Large numbers of Jenkins-Dodge $10 notes were withdrawn, unissued, when the more secure issue of 2005 became available."   

We all know few BEL, 2003 BEK (insert or non), and BEP saw the light of day.   For some reason, many 2003/2004 notes came out in sporadic random order, and not at all what we were expecting.  I think it will be a while yet before we know exactly how rare a lot these notes are.