should be a rotator...

News: Welcome to the Canadian Paper Money Forum.

I understand from previous threads that, technically, this note does not qualify as a rotator.
Would it have any additional value die to the serial number?

I understand from previous threads that, technically, this note does not qualify as a rotator.
Would it have any additional value due to the serial number?

http://imagizer.imageshack.com/img911/4994/4JVlSI.jpg

I would count it as a rotator. The editors of Charlton assert that 1s are disallowed because of the serif, but 8s are allowed despite the sizes of the loops being different. Charlton is just a publishing company that issues an annual catalogue, it's not an official word on anything. You are welcome to disagree on their definition; I certainly do.

PMG seems to feel the same way...

Though it may be an error as the front only states its a replacement.

Thanks for your input guys.
I've always thought it was a rotator. It's nice to know someone else thinks.

Thanks for your input guys.
I've always thought it was a rotator. It's nice to know someone else thinks.

Hi 4mile123,

I am by no means stating that under Canadian standards it is a rotator, only that PMG which is an American grading company in this case has whether by error or not.

Manny