Author
Topic: Was the HOW test note a hoax  (Read 12181 times)
stevepot99
  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 303
  • Pushing the boundaries
« on: June 13, 2007, 08:23:32 pm »

 I have not heard anything about it any news ?
Archey80
  • Very Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 512
« Reply #1 on: June 14, 2007, 11:58:30 am »

Good Question!

CPMS Member 1564
Archey80
  • Very Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 512
« Reply #2 on: June 14, 2007, 06:42:31 pm »

X-Savior semms to be everywhere but here.... ???

CPMS Member 1564
inrepno
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 134
  • Long live the paper!
« Reply #3 on: June 26, 2007, 06:17:14 pm »

The HOW and others (HOK, HOY, HOZ...) were just printed on two types of paper or on paper of different thickness/varnish. I found several of them.

INREPNO.
Hudson A B
  • Very Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,501
« Reply #4 on: June 26, 2007, 08:34:40 pm »

Excerpt from reply from BoC about this:

In terms of the Canadian Journey $5 notes currently in circulation, there
 shouldn't be any noticeable difference in the paper composition -this is
 assuming the notes you are comparing are genuine. A change in paper supplier
 did occur in 2004 because the domestic paper supplier we were dealing with
 went bankrupt. We are now dealing with a different supplier. However, the
 technical specifications for the paper have remained unchanged.

--- End BoC,  Bold added for emphasis.

Within any product, there are variations within an acceptable range.  As long as the paper was still acceptable, it was used.  Thus the soft/light feeling notes that were found.  This is what makes most sense to me.  The point is, there WERE changes going on.

I don't belive it was a hoax.  Perhaps a jumping of the gun maybe; but hoax implys "intent to decieve" and I do not believe there was.

CPMS Lifetime Member #1502.
inrepno
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 134
  • Long live the paper!
« Reply #5 on: June 27, 2007, 07:02:27 am »

Thanks, Hudson, for the more complete explanation.
I agree with you on all points.
A thing however, the "change" is not significative.

Most significative is the varnish used on the AOG prefix 5$,
but unfortunately the change seem to have occured around the midddle of the prefix:I have 4M without varnish and 6M with varnish, so no speculation will take place, in my opinion.

For the moment the AOG without varnish are more difficult to locate.


INREPNO.
 

Login with username, password and session length