I must be lucky over the 15 bricks this year, landing one (crazy, but well meaning) brick with a few AORs and AOTs Huds. Two different replacements in the same brick was strange enough.
AOM (0480000 - 0482000) 2K
AOM (0483000 - 0484000) 1K
AOP (7075000 - 7076000) 1K
AOR (2640000 - 2643000) 3K
FEP (0045000 - 0135000) 90K
BEU (0023000 - 0025000) 2K
With the exception of the FEP, looking at these numbers one would too easily draw conclusion that all these should have similar rarity but doesn’t seem to be the case with known or anecdotal selling prices varying so widely. The real issue this boils down to is how many were found or spared from circulation, and that would be the final determination of buy/sell prices. I would tend to agree there is some correlation with range sizes but we have to accept it as
part of the answer. With FEP I can only surmise there were very few despite the relatively large range, also that tens are not as well searched than the fives. Could most of them been destroyed in a changeover? I don’t know.
I would think AOM prices can be at par with AORs, and that the AOPs would even fewer demanding a higher premium. We just cannot account for those that escaped circulation or simply non-disclosed by some finders. Unless we have reports of all finds we won’t know and panic buying should not be the way we should base a general pricing on a given note(s). It would be nice if we could just seen the reports from Giles that X number of notes were reported for AOX range etc, ect.
PD
