The fact is that I know of 4 brickers in the past year that have been shut down from getting anything ....
Thank you for sharing your knowledge on brickers. I am trying to understand the whole idea of replacement range determination vis-a-vis some of the issues discussed in this thread. My current understanding (and I do not pretend to be an expert) is that the current method of determining replacement ranges can only work because of the work of the brickers.
Now the Fintrac requirements set out for financial institutions are very clear.
a) The banks HAVE TO report single transactions which are $10,000 or more. No level of bank management has any discretion here. The only bricks that would be under $10,000 would be for $5 denomination. So I would think that anyone who is doing bricking for $10, $20, $50 and $100 denominated notes is doing it with full disclosure (not withstanding the fact that there are huge dollar amounts involved for higher denominations)
b) Additionally banks have to report unusual activities that may suggest money laundering or terrorist activities. The Fintrac guideline provides examples of unusual activities and leaves it upto the banks to report them. Now most of the things that have been discussed in this thread will fall within the guideline as unusual activity. But the banks have some discretion unless of course a computer algorithm is calling the shots. The fines for banks not reporting unusual activities that may be related to money laundering or terrorist acitivities are very high so it would follow that they would err on the side of caution.
Given the amount of replacement ranges still being found for $50 and $100 denomination I cannot help but think that there is still a way around the Fintrac requirements. I wouldn't blame anyone for keeping trade secrets given that G-UNC replacements are valued very highly.