Similarly the same thing pattern happened once the GR test note was found and regeular GR notes started going up in price. It just shows you that speculation in our hobby is alive and well.
MG
There is always going to be speculation. I wouldn't judge the overall health of the hobby based on a bit of speculation. In fact, I would look at the items that are not being speculated on and gauge how they are doing to find a more appropriate check on the health of the hobby. The G/R prefix is an enigma reinforced by the catalogue. Just like the price of gasoline, the catalogue prices go up in a hurry but are very slow to come back down. I would love to know the reasons people have to paying big prices for non-test G/R notes. Do they really think there will be more test ranges "uncovered" for the G/R prefix?
Anyway, back to the subject of AUH, it looks like a simple case of "I saved $30 bucks on the price of a catalogue AND I bought a whole bunch of really rare notes! That's WIN-WIN, baby!!"
It's interesting that on the numicanada website, they have their own price guide for Birds series $2 notes, and I had to take a good look to realize that pricing for Crow-Bouey $2 notes is not in alphabetical order...
http://numicanada.com/billets-de-banque-valeur.php?billets=Billets_de_banque_du_Canada_de_1986_%E0_1991&id_cat=18&id_denom=3
Specifically, they put AUG-AUH in the middle of the chart AFTER prefixes AUJ and AUK. Someone taking their first look at the listings would think AUH does not exist for Crow-Bouey, but the AUH listing for Thiessen-Crow stands out clearly. If the hype of Facebook was started by someone using the numicanada site as a reference, I think that is how they made the mistake. Either that or it was deliberate, lol.
This was all over Facebook this week.
And yet I am the first person to talk about it here, and I am not even on Facebook. Why do we bother having this site, I wonder?