Author
Topic: My only $500 note  (Read 18507 times)
Gary_T
  • Very Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,081
  • CPMS radar member 1551
« on: April 05, 2019, 04:24:43 pm »

A picture of my only $500 note.
Anyone else have this kind of stuff?
I got this from the fonder of this site Paul Wallis


Gary_T
wagnert89
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 179
« Reply #1 on: April 05, 2019, 09:43:21 pm »

Nice $500, more affordable than the real one!  I have these wallets that have bills like $50  and $100 as the design.  Not sure if I would use it in public, but it's still cool
Dean
  • Very Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 734
  • GO LEAFS GO!
« Reply #2 on: October 14, 2019, 01:45:19 pm »

I own a French back and face proof pair that I bought many moons ago and overpaid for.  It's probably the closest I'll ever get to owning a circulation issue $500 note so I still have it.  You don't lose unless you sell, right?

docstrange
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 212
  • Paper Money is art!
« Reply #3 on: October 14, 2019, 06:16:04 pm »

Any way you could post a photo of it? Would love to see it
AL-Bob
  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 377
    • Prestige Banknote
« Reply #4 on: October 14, 2019, 09:53:15 pm »

I own a French back and face proof pair that I bought many moons ago and overpaid for.  It's probably the closest I'll ever get to owning a circulation issue $500 note so I still have it.  You don't lose unless you sell, right?

Don't know what you paid but I doubt you overpaid for it.  Those are extremely popular even as proofs.  We'll just see what the set sells for in the coming Torex auction and you can tell us again if you still think you overpaid for yours.


AL-Bob(at)cdnpapermoney com
wagnert89
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 179
« Reply #5 on: October 27, 2019, 10:59:06 am »


Speaking of the $500 proof, the French Back Proof catalog number is JMZ in the 2019 catalog?  What does JMZ mean or is that a typo?
« Last Edit: October 27, 2019, 11:25:27 am by wagnert89 »
walktothewater
  • Very Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,394
  • Join the Journey
    • Notaphylic Culture
« Reply #6 on: October 27, 2019, 02:19:59 pm »

Good eye.  I see it is on P224 & appears on the 30th edition too.  I am wondering if it was an old annotation/code for an old auction since it lists for $2,600 in UNC (before the specimen/proofs were given a Charlton code) & it just never got flagged?  Probably should post this on the "GPM 32 revisions" thread.

wagnert89
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 179
« Reply #7 on: October 27, 2019, 07:42:55 pm »

Ok thank you for confirming that I am not loosing my mind  :D

Where is the catelogue thread page because  I have posted there before but can not seem to find it.
« Last Edit: October 28, 2019, 10:37:34 am by wagnert89 »
Mike67
  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 5
« Reply #8 on: December 22, 2019, 06:21:30 pm »

It's the only 500$ bill i can afford !  :D

Mike67
AJG
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 170
« Reply #9 on: January 29, 2020, 01:14:37 pm »

Aren't $500 bills going to lose legal tender status in 2021, and if so, will they lose their collectors' value?

Makes me wonder if the Charlton Catalogue for 2021 will remove the price list for the defunct banknotes/denominations, implying they are only worth face value to redeem at a bank?
friedsquid
  • Very Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2,879
  • CPMS 1593
« Reply #10 on: January 29, 2020, 05:54:18 pm »

Makes me wonder if the Charlton Catalogue for 2021 will remove the price list for the defunct banknotes/denominations, implying they are only worth face value to redeem at a bank?

Personally I do not see this happening.

Please someone correct me if I am wrong, but my understanding is that a specimen note
In any denomination is not worth face value?????
(I am not talking about collectible value)
« Last Edit: January 29, 2020, 05:57:11 pm by friedsquid »



Always looking for #1 serial number notes in any denomination/any series
Seth
  • Very Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 936
« Reply #11 on: January 29, 2020, 07:38:17 pm »

Aren't $500 bills going to lose legal tender status in 2021, and if so, will they lose their collectors' value?

Makes me wonder if the Charlton Catalogue for 2021 will remove the price list for the defunct banknotes/denominations, implying they are only worth face value to redeem at a bank?

Legal tender status means next to nothing. The "big" announcement that old notes will lose their legal tender status makes no real difference to either their cashable value or their collector value. Not to worry.

Track your Canadian currency online!

http://www.whereswilly.com
Beatrix
  • Junior Member
  • **
  • Posts: 81
« Reply #12 on: January 30, 2020, 11:39:18 am »

Legal tender is a term that only refers to the paying of debts. As I understand it, if I owe you $500 and I choose to pay it by giving you a 500 dollar bill, you can't reject it and force me to pay a different way, because I offered you legal tender. Once it loses that status, you CAN legally tell me that I have to pay you back a different way.

That's all it means. Nothing about how much it's worth to a collector, or a bank for that matter.
friedsquid
  • Very Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2,879
  • CPMS 1593
« Reply #13 on: January 30, 2020, 06:49:37 pm »


 As I understand it, if I owe you $500 and I choose to pay it by giving you a 500 dollar bill, you can't reject it and force me to pay a different way, because I offered you legal tender.

Correct me if I am wrong, but since many stores, and other businesses refuse to Accept
$100 bills and some even $50 bills even though they are legal tender doesn’t agree with your comment.
This also seems to apply to paying for something with an excessive amount of
coinage.
Try going into a gas bar and give them
30 bucks in nickels... 😉 good luck



Always looking for #1 serial number notes in any denomination/any series
Seth
  • Very Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 936
« Reply #14 on: February 01, 2020, 12:29:52 am »

Legal tender is a term that only refers to the paying of debts. As I understand it, if I owe you $500 and I choose to pay it by giving you a 500 dollar bill, you can't reject it and force me to pay a different way, because I offered you legal tender.

No. "Legal tender" does not have that definition in Canada. You can read the definition here, it includes nothing about anyone being required to accept "legal tender" for a payment: https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/c-52/page-1.html#h-142377
It basically means "officially approved for use", not "required for use". That's why I said that the term is essentially meaningless, because people and institutions can use what ever is mutually acceptable, whether or not it is officially approved.


Track your Canadian currency online!

http://www.whereswilly.com
 

Login with username, password and session length