Charlton 2025 Missing: line for 2013 $5 Issue Rogers-Macklem INS

News: Registration is free here at the CPMF!

Hi all,

Charlton 2025  Missing: line for 2013 $5 Issue Rogers-Macklem INS

Cheers,
Breanna

Charlton 2025  Missing: line for 2013 $5 Issue Rogers-Macklem INS

-Yes, I wonder if they ran out of space (by squeezing in Rogers-Macklem INT-INY) which wasn't really necessary since we don't know ho far Rogers Macklem will go.

The one typo that stood out for me was on the 10th row (from the top) on the same page (253):
Wilkins-Macklem IND-INK
What?
They have the 2 HBG change-overs correct; the 2 HCM change-overs correct & then that (& then even the INK change-overs correct).  I did notice a couple other typos too but I have to go over it again as it was in December when I picked up mine & did not circle the things I saw that didn't make sense.

-Yes, I wonder if they ran out of space (by squeezing in Rogers-Macklem INT-INY) which wasn't really necessary since we don't know ho far Rogers Macklem will go.

The one typo that stood out for me was on the 10th row (from the top) on the same page (253):
Wilkins-Macklem IND-INK
What?
They have the 2 HBG change-overs correct; the 2 HCM change-overs correct & then that (& then even the INK change-overs correct).  I did notice a couple other typos too but I have to go over it again as it was in December when I picked up mine & did not circle the things I saw that didn't make sense.

Hey WTTW,

Ya, if they just delete that '-INK' part and add the Rogers INSs it would be correct.  The SNDB is showing INY, INZ and IOA and IOB being issued now.  I have one branch that seems to get new notes of every $5 prefix and lets see if I will be one of the first to enter IOC for fun.

Every year I say to myself I'm not going to buy a Charlton, and then l do and so little changes, I say why did I do it. 

Cheers, B