Author
Topic: Rogers-Macklem $100 notes  (Read 873 times)
AZ
  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 343
« on: January 27, 2024, 12:10:28 pm »

Prefix HJK, so the changeover must be somewhere in HJH, HJJ or HJK.

robb4640
  • Junior Member
  • **
  • Posts: 62
« Reply #1 on: January 27, 2024, 07:33:16 pm »

Just added another one to the database.  slightly lower number.


AZ
  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 343
« Reply #2 on: January 30, 2024, 02:58:51 pm »

The Bank of Canada has replied to my query about the latest $5 and $100 changeovers:

$5 Lane Macklem Last Note INS3977999
$5 Rogers Macklem First Note INS3978000

$100 Lane Macklem Last Note HJH1979999
$100 Rogers Macklem First Note HJH1980000
AJG
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 144
« Reply #3 on: February 01, 2024, 05:58:35 am »

Nice to see the new signatures on another denomination.  It's too bad I may have to wait many months or maybe even a year or more before they appear in Atlantic Canada.  I'll probably have a better chance of seeing the late arrival $100 HJ prefixes (HJB and/or HJD) before I get to see the new signatures on a regular basis, but at least there are big jumps in prefixes for all denominations nowadays, so hopefully in the spring I may see one or two prefixes in the HJ series. However, I am quite surprised there hasn't been any movement on the HH* series new prefixes on the $50s for some time.
rxcory
  • Junior Member
  • **
  • Posts: 21
« Reply #4 on: February 02, 2024, 01:38:23 pm »

Is there any chance of getting the SNDB updated?


CPMS member 1994
rxcory
  • Junior Member
  • **
  • Posts: 21
« Reply #5 on: February 23, 2024, 11:39:46 am »

These are still appearing as Lane/Macklem signatures on the SNDB. Is anyone able to update the SNDB to reflect the new Rogers/Macklem signatures?


CPMS member 1994
 

Login with username, password and session length