Now then, since that's taken care of, let's take a couple swings at it and see if we can't come up with some ideas, eh?
Take a close look at the scan of the big 20 and 5 counters. The 20 is nice and crisp, but the 5 shows ragged edges. Also, notice a couple of the blue fibres along the right edge of that scan. Isn't that odd, they look ragged too!
In fact, almost all of the intaglio from the 5 image looks ragged too, even on other scans. It doesn't really look like intaglio printing.
Now go over to the scan of the portraits. Look at the holographic strip. Seems odd that the strip and a margin on either side of it is not covered at all by any part of the 5 image. It's entirely untouched! I just tried a little experiment. I took the fat end of a sharpie and drew a streak across the holographic strip on a $20 from my wallet, then promptly attempted to rub it off with a Kleenex. The strip itself and a margin on either side came out clean, but the marker outside the margin held fast.
INTERESTING I'm going with d_polo here.
Logged
BWJM, F.O.N.A.
Life Member of CPMS, RCNA, ONA, ANA, IBNS, WCS.
President, IBNS Ontario Chapter.
Treasurer, Waterloo Coin Society.
Show Chair, Cambridge Coin Show.
Fellow of the Ontario Numismatic Association.