I understand your ideas Ottawa, but I'm inclined to agree with "Rachel_" in that a note for me doesn't have to be expensive, or necessarily a flashy showpiece to be considered a "Trophy Note". The whole concept of what a trophy is got me really thinking, and the fisherman in me would consider a "trophy" note to be a note that: a) is a found rarity that cost you face value
or b) is a rare "sleeper" bought at a show or auction (for a fraction of book value)
I know of a couple collectors on this forum who regularly attend shows and find incredible rarities with very little cost. Why? Because like a good angler, they're armed with knowledge and patience, and go through inspecting many many many notes to find that 1 prize. Like a fisherman, they go to these shows early, and catch the "whopper" while everyone's napping .......
The notes displayed on this thread remind me more of "Blue Ribbon" notes. That's the best "metaphor" I can think of because: they have a history, are show-stoppers, and a cut above most other notes. If they were to be judged, they would be very highly rated for their exceptional rarity/beauty.
Some good comments have been made here, particularly the "Blue Ribbon" suggestion. I used to be an angler of doubtful repute many years ago and I therefore appreciated the fishing analogy!
I think perhaps that my original post was less explicit than it should have been. I was using the word Trophy (large T) as an adjective and not as a noun. There's a big difference between a "personal" trophy (small T) and a Trophy Note. A "personal" trophy might be something like a $5 1979 "33" Test Note in VF that you picked up at a flea market for $10.00. However, such a note, although desirable, would not stand out as anything very special in a dealer's display case at a show. However, a Province of Canada $10 1866 note in VF would definitely be a "show stopper" and would unambiguously be a Trophy Note. Whether or not many collectors could afford to purchase that $10 1866 note is not the issue here --- it's the rarity, quality and desirability of the note itself that matters. Believe it or not, one of those $10 1866 notes showed up at an auction in
New Zealand of all places way back in the late 1970's --- it found its way into Jack Veffer's collection at that time and subsequently appeared in the legendary INTERPAM'81 auction in Toronto in July 1981 (estimated at $50,000 by the way, but it didn't sell!)
I think we all have our personal favorites and these are often items that have particular sentimental interest to us, and usually to us alone. They may be big trophies to us personally but in most cases they wouldn't have any special significance to anyone else. However, a true Trophy Note, by definition, is a note that hits you in the face as soon as you see it and you know that you'll probably never see another one like it outside of an institutional collection.
Most true Trophy Notes outside museums were locked up long ago by specialized collectors who are usually less interested in making a quick profit than in enjoying the "opium" of ownership. We often forget that in the 18th and 19th centuries in Europe serious numismatists usually accepted a loss when selling their material, i.e., they were willing to pay a financial price for the pleasure of ownership (prices didn't creep up relentlessly year after year in those days). Things are a bit different now although we all take a loss from time to time when we get careless or greedy --- even after 35 years of adult collecting I still make careless errors and I'm sure I'm not alone...
[attachment deleted by admin]
« Last Edit: October 02, 2006, 02:51:52 pm by Ottawa »
Logged
" Buy the very best notes that you can afford and keep them for at least 10 years. " (Richard D. Lockwood, private communication, 1978).