Author
Topic: Petition to Charlton, CPMS against sub UNC grading  (Read 34932 times)
Hudson A B
  • Very Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,501
« Reply #30 on: April 13, 2007, 05:41:53 pm »

I believe this petition brought some FAST awareness to the dangers of TPG notes, who were advertising many grades of UNC --> With reliability in question.

I think it was very valuable in this way.  3 grades of UNC beats 10 or 9.  ::)

CPMS Lifetime Member #1502.
rscoins
  • Very Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 708
  • CPMS member 1221, ONA life member, CAND President
« Reply #31 on: April 14, 2007, 03:11:27 pm »

3 grades of Uncirculated notes beats a much larger number spread on these pages. The Sheldon system of numbers was never intended to have up to 9 or 10 different grades of Unc. coins, and certainly would be most difficult to have so many for notes, and probably more confusing.

Unc. 60, 63, 65 is more than enough for paper.

Rick
kasper001
  • Junior Member
  • **
  • Posts: 19
« Reply #32 on: April 26, 2007, 06:47:57 pm »

Add my name to the petition please:

Karol Winograd, Connecticut

kasper001
Stevev
  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 12
  • Paper Money is Art!
« Reply #33 on: April 29, 2007, 06:16:34 pm »

Add me also aginst sub UNC
Steve Vrountzos
CMNWEALTH
  • Junior Member
  • **
  • Posts: 33
  • One Chromosome between Insane and Genious !
« Reply #34 on: May 17, 2007, 07:46:07 pm »

Sorry just realized this site, I truly agree that the private collector is the only to suffer from greed of others. Erroneous grading principles only discourage and confuse even the common collector. The Big prey on the small, but the smart prey on the Big. I Hope were not too late !

Ian Vincze
may271974
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 117
« Reply #35 on: June 22, 2007, 12:38:18 pm »

Gerry Parker
Ottawa
  • Very Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 641
  • World Paper Money Collector
« Reply #36 on: June 29, 2007, 05:39:24 pm »

I signed this petition many months ago. However, it seems that the petition did not succeed as the next edition of the Charlton Government Paper Money Catalogue WILL be incorporating various degrees of Unc.

I was therefore wondering whether it would be appropriate to remove the "sticky" on this thread?
« Last Edit: June 30, 2007, 07:24:12 am by Ottawa »

" Buy the very best notes that you can afford and keep them for at least 10 years. " (Richard D. Lockwood, private communication, 1978).
X-Savior
  • Very Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 625
  • Been There, Done That.... Wanna do it again?
« Reply #37 on: June 29, 2007, 05:41:53 pm »

agreed

Sorry Ladies...I am now a Married Man!!!
Hudson A B
  • Very Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,501
« Reply #38 on: June 29, 2007, 08:41:02 pm »

Note that this thread may have helped LIMIT the numbered grading system...  It could have gotten ridiculous...

CPMS Lifetime Member #1502.
buxvet
  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 389
  • Is there anybody in the ceremony is about to begin
« Reply #39 on: July 21, 2007, 08:42:09 pm »

3 grades of Uncirculated notes beats a much larger number spread on these pages. The Sheldon system of numbers was never intended to have up to 9 or 10 different grades of Unc. coins, and certainly would be most difficult to have so many for notes, and probably more confusing.

Unc. 60, 63, 65 is more than enough for paper.

Rick


I was in Kitchener the other day and dropped into a popular Coin store there. The fellow said they sent away a few notes to PMG to test them out.

A note he graded AU-UNC ( 1937 $ 1 with 2 large counting creases ) came back as UNC66. These creases were so prevalant you could see them through the plastic holder. There is a lot of PMG stuff floating around out there. Beware !!
 

Login with username, password and session length