Author
Topic: June 2009 Torex Auction  (Read 18316 times)
1971HemiCuda
  • Wiki Editor
  • Very Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 751
  • CPMS #1659
« on: May 28, 2009, 08:22:23 am »

I was looking through the catalogue for the upcomming Torex auction (I was adding some other notes to the WIKI) and there are 5 1937 Osborne notes. 4 under VF grade. But one is Unc. I find it weird that this is such a rare note, but yet there are 5 selling at a single auction. Is it because of the economy?
« Last Edit: June 05, 2009, 09:55:41 pm by BWJM »


friedsquid
  • Very Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2,879
  • CPMS 1593
« Reply #1 on: May 28, 2009, 09:49:08 am »

I was looking through the catalogue for the upcomming Torex auction (I was adding some other notes to the WIKI) and there are 5 1937 Osborne notes. 4 under VF grade. But one is Unc. I find it weird that this is such a rare note, but yet there are 5 selling at a single auction. Is it because of the economy?
You never know the real situation, maybe all of the notes are from one collector, or from a few different consignors....I don't think that everyone is selling simply because of the economy...but there does seem to be some nice notes up for auction....will be interesting to see what sells and what doesn't.



Always looking for #1 serial number notes in any denomination/any series
venga50
  • Very Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 514
« Reply #2 on: June 05, 2009, 09:06:13 pm »

Does anyone think that the 1937 Specimen set will realize a selling price in the $17,500 to $19,500 range as indicated in the catalogue? It is lot 691, being auctioned on June 25th.

Given the current economic situation and that 5% GST plus a buyer's fee of 15-18% will be added to the winning bid, I'm thinking that the bidding wouldn't go much higher than $14,000 (meaning a final price of over $17,200).

Other thoughts on whether this would be a good investment, and the highest bid you think will be made?

(Understandably, any Forum members considering bidding on this item will likely not comment on what they think it should sell for  ::))

1971HemiCuda
  • Wiki Editor
  • Very Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 751
  • CPMS #1659
« Reply #3 on: June 05, 2009, 09:08:36 pm »

When I seen that lot I also didnt think bidding would reach its estimate.
My estimate would be $12,500-$14,000 (Just Bid, No Buyers Fee)
« Last Edit: June 25, 2009, 06:08:09 pm by 1971HemiCuda »


gus5pin
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 174
  • Paper Money is art!
« Reply #4 on: June 23, 2009, 09:22:42 pm »

Hell I hope that it does sell for the catalogue price. I know the market is a little slow right now but the higher the better.

I won't be in the area during Torex but can someone please let me know what the final bid is for that specimen set please.

Denis

1971HemiCuda
  • Wiki Editor
  • Very Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 751
  • CPMS #1659
« Reply #5 on: June 23, 2009, 10:02:11 pm »

I will be keeping track of what some of the notes sell for. I will let you know about the Specimen set.
« Last Edit: June 24, 2009, 09:57:13 pm by 1971HemiCuda »


Aubrey993
  • Junior Member
  • **
  • Posts: 58
« Reply #6 on: June 25, 2009, 09:35:02 pm »

Set just sold for $12,750 + fees.
venga50
  • Very Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 514
« Reply #7 on: June 25, 2009, 11:24:38 pm »

Hell I hope that it does sell for the catalogue price. I know the market is a little slow right now but the higher the better.

I won't be in the area during Torex but can someone please let me know what the final bid is for that specimen set please.

Denis
What is the catalogue price these days?  The latest Charlton's catalogue I have is the 19th edition that prices the 1937 specimen set at $13,500.00.

With tonight's auction, this set will cost the winner a total of close to $16,000.00.

I was also watching lot 666 - the 1935 $25.00 note.  Looks like the winner backed out because at one point it was going for the minimum bid of $8,750.00, but when the auction ended the note remained unsold.  Maybe the bidder was creeped out by the lot number 666, and that 2 celebrities died today??   ???
« Last Edit: June 30, 2009, 04:27:15 pm by venga50 »

Aubrey993
  • Junior Member
  • **
  • Posts: 58
« Reply #8 on: June 25, 2009, 11:57:54 pm »

21st edition shows the set @ $15,500 in AU condition.
Ottawa
  • Very Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 641
  • World Paper Money Collector
« Reply #9 on: June 26, 2009, 09:02:40 am »

I was also watching lot 666 - the 1935 $25.00 note.  Looks like the winner backed out because at one point it was going for the minimum bid of $8,750.00, but when the auction ended the note remained unsold.  Maybe the bidder was creeped out by the lot number 666, and that 2 celebrities died today??   ???

It's likely that the reserve price was set higher than the minimum bid price, which is often the case. Auctions can be very frustrating and confusing indeed, unless you're physically present on the bidding floor ....

" Buy the very best notes that you can afford and keep them for at least 10 years. " (Richard D. Lockwood, private communication, 1978).
1971HemiCuda
  • Wiki Editor
  • Very Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 751
  • CPMS #1659
« Reply #10 on: June 26, 2009, 04:59:30 pm »

Set just sold for $12,750 + fees.

$12,750(Bid)+$2,295(Fees)=$15,045


venga50
  • Very Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 514
« Reply #11 on: June 27, 2009, 12:17:13 am »

Tonight's session appears to have been a major flop!  Well over half of the items failed to sell and the vast majority of those that DID sell went at, or even below, the start prices.

Although there were some lots here and there that sold for even more than the given "estimated at" ranges.

I am completely baffled by lot 1966! Start Price: $15.00, Estimated At: $30.00-$40.00.

Sold for: 300.00 + 54.00 (Buyer's Premium) = 354.00 CAD   :o

Even if the winning bid of $300.00 was from a "crank", wouldn't the underbidder have bid at least $275.00??   ???

Ottawa
  • Very Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 641
  • World Paper Money Collector
« Reply #12 on: June 27, 2009, 03:24:00 am »

I am completely baffled by lot 1966! Start Price: $15.00, Estimated At: $30.00-$40.00.

Sold for: 300.00 + 54.00 (Buyer's Premium) = 354.00 CAD   :o

There were presumably some ultra-high-grade coins in that lot of modern nickels, e.g. MS-68's.

" Buy the very best notes that you can afford and keep them for at least 10 years. " (Richard D. Lockwood, private communication, 1978).
Ottawa
  • Very Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 641
  • World Paper Money Collector
« Reply #13 on: June 27, 2009, 03:30:50 am »

Tonight's session appears to have been a major flop!  Well over half of the items failed to sell and the vast majority of those that DID sell went at, or even below, the start prices.

The poor performance can be largely explained by two effects, as follows:

(1) the restraining effects of the global recession on luxury (non-essential) purchases.

http://www.cdnpapermoney.com/forum/index.php?topic=9472.0

(2) many of the lots probably carried optimistically-high "pre-recession" reserves.
« Last Edit: June 27, 2009, 03:35:42 am by Ottawa »

" Buy the very best notes that you can afford and keep them for at least 10 years. " (Richard D. Lockwood, private communication, 1978).
venga50
  • Very Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 514
« Reply #14 on: June 27, 2009, 04:04:21 am »

The poor performance can be largely explained by two effects, as follows:

(1) the restraining effects of the global recession on luxury (non-essential) purchases.

http://www.cdnpapermoney.com/forum/index.php?topic=9472.0

(2) many of the lots probably carried optimistically-high "pre-recession" reserves.

I'm leaning more towards #2 as the explanation.  Shouldn't CNC have taken the recession more seriously into account when setting the bid prices? Then again, to be fair, I don't know how much lead time goes into organizing these auctions and putting together the catalogues - the recession might not have even started...

The timing of the auction was probably bad too - with the 22nd edition of Charlton's due out next month, people were probably reluctant to bid without knowing how the pricing will pan out in the 22nd edition...

 

Login with username, password and session length