Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
Home
The Notes
Forum
Help
Serial Number DB
Login
Register
News:
Welcome to the
Canadian Paper Money Forum
.
Canadian Paper Money
CPM Forum
General
General Forum Comments
(Moderators:
Bob
,
eyevet
,
JB-2007
,
coinsplus
,
MAS1
,
Wizard1
)
1967 beattie signed
« previous
next »
Pages: [
1
]
Print
Author
Topic: 1967 beattie signed (Read 8789 times)
iwantitall
Junior Member
Posts: 19
1967 beattie signed
«
on:
June 12, 2013, 10:40:32 pm »
was wondering if you think the signature was real
{http://img692.imageshack.us/img692/5096/beattiev.jpg:http://img692.imageshack.us/img692/5096/beattiev.th.jpg}
Logged
coinsplus
Moderator
Posts: 765
Yabba Dabba D'OH$$$
Re: 1967 beattie signed
«
Reply #1 on:
June 12, 2013, 11:40:30 pm »
The signature looks authentic to me. Most likely post-Senior Deputy Governor (after retirement) in the 70s. The signature is a bit fragile at the end.... A bit of shaking of the hands (due to old age).
«
Last Edit: June 13, 2013, 12:04:34 am by coinsplus
»
Logged
Smile from your heart.
Fosse
Junior Member
Posts: 17
Re: 1967 beattie signed
«
Reply #2 on:
January 11, 2014, 07:37:45 pm »
I don't think it's authentic... everyone has key markers to their signatures. In this case the first marker that jumps out to me is the upward stroke from the "R" to the "B" and then the placement of the dot above the "I" instead of below...
Just my opinion...
Logged
t-spoon64
Junior Member
Posts: 26
Re: 1967 beattie signed
«
Reply #3 on:
January 11, 2014, 10:33:36 pm »
I too think it looks real All the strokes look very close with the exception of the first "e". But, I still think it all looks good.
Logged
Shylo
Full Member
Posts: 213
Re: 1967 beattie signed
«
Reply #4 on:
January 20, 2014, 08:31:17 am »
This one is a tough one for me... at first glance I would've said no... then yes... and then I was back to no...
The biggest problem with this individuals signature is that it OUT in the public so much it's easy for someone to get a hold of it and practice it.
I would say you would need some provenance.. otherwise I personally wouldn't accept it.
Logged
Bruxi
Full Member
Posts: 115
Re: 1967 beattie signed
«
Reply #5 on:
January 20, 2014, 07:47:14 pm »
That looks real to me. No two signatures are exactly the same, but all the key patterns of the signature are there. I can't imagine it adds a ton of value, but looks real.
Logged
mmars
Very Senior Member
Posts: 1,352
money is gregarious
Re: 1967 beattie signed
«
Reply #6 on:
February 01, 2014, 03:37:08 pm »
Notes with *courtesy signatures* seem to be coming up for sale more and more. Since ImageShack is not working at the moment, I can only provide the item numbers...
121264161725
181248461322
Logged
No hay banda
golddigger
Junior Member
Posts: 35
Re: 1967 beattie signed
«
Reply #7 on:
February 05, 2014, 11:49:37 pm »
I would think if someone was going to take the time to fake the signature ,they would put the dot for the "i" in the right place. Therefore i think its good. As for added value ??
Logged
Pages: [
1
]
Print
« previous
next »
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length