Author
Topic: 1991 20$ missing back  (Read 5242 times)
maz_atenza
  • Guest
« on: February 24, 2007, 07:10:10 pm »

Hello  :)

I search around and I cant access the hig-low list ( wrong password) I guess I need another password than the forum one..

Anyway, i'm looking for the value of a 1991 20$ missing 100% of the back, both serial showing, condition, EF-AU

the owner want 450$Can...good deal or fair market value ?

Thanks
MAZ
Archey80
  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 494
« Reply #1 on: February 24, 2007, 07:11:53 pm »

Thats a great deal I would buy it in a second :o

Arthur

CPMS Member 1564
maz_atenza
  • Guest
« Reply #2 on: February 24, 2007, 07:27:16 pm »

what do you think its worth?

ive seen on ebay buy it now at around 1000$ but a lot of time the buy it now price is way too high
Archey80
  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 494
« Reply #3 on: February 24, 2007, 07:46:42 pm »

There was one on eBay maybe 6-8 months ago it was EF and sold for over $600

Arthur

CPMS Member 1564
maz_atenza
  • Guest
« Reply #4 on: February 24, 2007, 08:01:02 pm »

He sent me a scan, what do you think?

Mikeysonfire
  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 345
« Reply #5 on: February 24, 2007, 08:05:43 pm »

That does not look EF-AU...  :-/
Archey80
  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 494
« Reply #6 on: February 24, 2007, 08:06:54 pm »

well to start that isnt even close to au or ef I would think its a VF note without seeing it... still $450 isnt bad I would email him and say I think the note is on vf would you take 400$ try and save a little more money but at $450 still a good price.

Arthur

CPMS Member 1564
moneycow
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 229
« Reply #7 on: February 24, 2007, 08:52:52 pm »

Looks like it might have been a swan or some other origami.  VF at best.
maz_atenza
  • Guest
« Reply #8 on: February 25, 2007, 12:37:20 am »

Quote
Looks like it might have been a swan or some other origami.  VF at best.

good one...

im not an expert like you guys thats why im asking your opinion.
so at vf I would probably be at fair market value?
Hudson A B
  • Very Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,501
« Reply #9 on: February 25, 2007, 06:32:20 am »

According to the Charlton grading standards, this should be a Fine + as far as I can tell.
The wear on the center crease alone shows broken paper fibres andsignificant wear, despite some partsof the bill looking not as bad.

If I was to list this, I would say "Fine" due to hard crease down center, regardless what the rest of the note looked like. (of course if the rest of the note was MINT, then that would need special mention)
« Last Edit: February 25, 2007, 06:33:31 am by hudsonab »

CPMS Lifetime Member #1502.
maz_atenza
  • Guest
« Reply #10 on: February 25, 2007, 12:50:03 pm »

thanks Hudson

so this might not be a deal at all.... :-/
Hudson A B
  • Very Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,501
« Reply #11 on: February 25, 2007, 05:04:12 pm »

Oh for an error like this, as rare as it is, I think that $450 might be okay....  
I don't specialize in errors, but if I were you, I wouldn't feel bad about that price :)

CPMS Lifetime Member #1502.
Archey80
  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 494
« Reply #12 on: February 25, 2007, 05:39:07 pm »

Yea I still think you should go back to the buyer and say its not EF-AU and ask him for $50 off and you will be getting a great price.

Arthur

CPMS Member 1564
jasper
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 129
  • Paper Money is art!
« Reply #13 on: February 25, 2007, 06:57:13 pm »

Catalog on that note would be 40% (for VF grade) of $900 (catalog in UNC), so $360.  So you can reasonably ask for $90 back.
maz_atenza
  • Guest
« Reply #14 on: February 25, 2007, 09:09:18 pm »

thanks all for your omment
Archey80
  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 494
« Reply #15 on: May 28, 2007, 02:50:33 pm »

Did you ever end up getting the note?

CPMS Member 1564
 

Login with username, password and session length