also wonder since some people are in the loop more than others, do they have the heads up on what is really going on. Sell before it becomes common knowledge that a once rare note is becoming more common. Anyone think the same way
Absolutely-- just as you are ahead of the common collector who doesn't tune into CPMF
Knowledge is power -- as they say. This has always been the case.
The total number of notes available in the "traditional" category is never likely to change much so what was a rarity 10 years ago will likely be even more of a rarity in 10 years time
I don't get this logic
How can something become more rare over time -- unless (heaven forbid) there was damage to a particular collection?
Hoards of old American notes are being found all the time, and I imagine it will be the same (to a lesser degree) for Cdn old notes. However, RARE notes will always remain RARE. I think what you are trying to say is that the demand for your #(1) Traditional field will increase -- while the demand for #(2) may vary.
On the contrary, most modern type notes are available in huge quantities and no one knows for sure how many of the "rare" prefixes and serial number varieties have been hoarded and will appear in the future. Thus, there is a much higher inherent risk in paying big money for a modern rarity than for a traditional rarity, unless of course official Bank of Canada records are made available to confirm the rarity of the notes in question. By way of example, I have noticed that the extremely rare $1 1954 Lawson-Bouey *C/I asterisk note seems to be appearing more frequently at auction these days.
I'm so confused
I did not know the *C/I (esp unmanufactured ones) were popping up all over Canada. I doubt the *V/V $1 or the *Z/Z $2 are that common... and I'm willing to bet big $ that they NEVER will become common...as most collectors know these were indeed extremely scarce.
I understand your tendancy to trust the value of the traditional field but I doubt the legitimacy of your claim (or rationalizations) that FIELD #2 (post 1937 series) notes won't be collected as avidly. In fact, I believe we've seen the opposite since many new collectors don't collect notes prior to 1937. As a collector gets older and diversifies his collecting (more experienced) - he/she may then start collecting older (pre-1937) notes -- but I doubt that there is a constant or consistent conversion to collecting the older (more expensive) notes.
While there is a more inherent risk in obtaining what one thinks is the latest rarity -- I believe a lot of collectors are willing to take that risk. After all, our sense of what is happening in the hobby (take R_P or Hudson's research on serial numbered trends) provides a sort of confidence amongst the collecting community.
I believe there is another factor you haven't taken into account here. I believe many colllectors prefer a very rare note that is at odds with the millions upon millions of notes produced. That's why those 1954 asterisks (or the G/R tests) or the R/S $5 test are so popular. A series can be popular for many reasons...and if its popular and there is a very rare note within that popular series-- then it becomes all the more sought after. In contrast-- the traditional field you're favouring-- well one is just plain lucky to get any type of note (any prefix - in a higher grade). There is less opportunity to specialize amongst many of the older notes although low numbers, the odd radar do exist.