I think my defenders have pretty much hit the nail on the head, and for that I thank them.
I (Steven Bell) am an individual who works for two separate companies, BCS and Colonial Acres Coins. This happens a lot in the world, especially if you have a such a specialized skill. The convience of us sharing the same office space does not imply that we are associated with eachother or schemeing to rip people off. Nor do my two rolls as Grader for BCS and Colonial Acres. I can assure you, Colonial Acres Coins does not get any special treatment from BCS. They are a customer of BCS just like many other dealers are.
For some reason, this person seems to think that the fact that Colonial Acres Coins having many BCS certified notes online right now is proof of our misgivings? When you think about it, it makes sense that Colonial choose BCS to certify their paper money. They know and trust the grading to be accurate and they are located so close. Makes sense to me.
On that note, I would like to say that I have taken many precausions to insure my two roles do not conflict with eachother. I do not buy BCS certified notes myself or on behalf of Colonial. I do not make the decisions as to what colonial pieces get certified. These rules are important to me because it helps maintain my integrety and image in the market place. What doesn't support my image are false statements based on suspicsion and speculation, and not a shread of evidence to back it up. Reputation is very important in this indusrty, especially for a third party grader. It could even be said that, in a way, BCS is selling it's reputation, or at least values it as a very important asset. Why would I do anything to tarnish such an important thing? I wish this person would have done his/her research before jumping to ludicrus conclusions.
Since these false statements involve Colonial Acres, I have notified the owner. I suspect he'll be as upset as I am with this unfounded accusation.
If anything needs clarifying, feel free to ask.
BCS