This is VERY True.
So why would they not admit this fact or are they even aware that the printer delivered notes without the feature.
Now this comes back to my original question, why did it take almost 1/2 a year for these notes to surface? It seems very clear these notes had been withheld for some reason then when they finally decided to release them they come in a HUGE flood across the country.
Being these notes were from the same paper as the late Non-Security did CBN Print these before handing off to BABN for the remainder of the printing /w the Varnish Application? Was the varnish not yet available during initial print runs? Was there a last minute change in the formula required so they abruptly terminated the final process until they could rectify the problem?
There is something they are not telling us.... Something like this does NOT go un-noticed as these are the first first notes to feature this heavy paper and varnish application. This would have been a VERY big undertaking.
Has anyone tried testing on the serial numbers to confirm if the varnish is protecting them as well? If they are over top of the varnish we should be able to prove it.
Here is a theory:
Step 1: Release notes with Varnish 1/2 a year in advance, check wear in Circulation
Step 2: Then release non-protected notes and wait for say another 9 months (Roughly the end of the year) and compare wear between them.
I am going to assume there were some kind of "Wear Guarantee" by the printer so this is a field test to prove this (Due to the higher cost per note must be Justified).
If Successful they may get the contract to starting other denominations in the "Varnish" with the backing of a proven track record. Most likely they are considering this for the $20 denomination next.